Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Rocky Mountain Geology Subscribe to Rocky Mountain Geology!
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rocky Mountain Geology; July 2001; v. 36; no. 1; p. 1-12; DOI: 10.2113/gsrocky.36.1.1
© 2001 University of Wyoming
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lester, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Funk, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Neoproterozoic kimberlite emplacement in the Front Range, Colorado

Alan P. Lester, Edwin E. Larson, G. Lang Farmer, Charles R. Stern and Jonathon A. Funk

Department of Geological Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0399, U.S.A.

A paucity of isotopic age determinations for the more than 100 kimberlitic diatremes, dikes, and sills within the Colorado-Wyoming kimberlite province has fostered the prevailing notion that emplacement of these bodies occurred during a discrete interval of ultramafic magmatism spanning Early to Late Devonian time. However, new geochronologic data for two kimberlite bodies (Chicken Park and Green Mountain kimberlites) support a Neoproterozoic emplacement age for these bodies.

40Ar/39Ar analysis of fine-grained matrix phlogopite from the Chicken Park dike indicates emplacement between 620 and 640 Ma. 40Ar/39Ar dating of the Green Mountain diatreme, utilizing both phlogopite megacrysts and mineral separates from xenoliths, is somewhat equivocal because of excess Ar, but suggests emplacement between 500 and 800 Ma. A Sm-Nd isochron, based on megacrystic phases from the Green Mountain diatreme, yields an age of 572 ±49 Ma.

Neoproterozoic emplacement indicates that the Colorado-Wyoming kimberlite province apparently has undergone multiple intervals of kimberlitic magmatism, similar to other kimberlite provinces worldwide. The episodes of kimberlite emplacement coincide with periods of relative orogenic and magmatic quiescence in Colorado and Wyoming.

Key Words: Kimberlites • geochronology • Front Range • Colorado




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeosphereHome page
G. P. Eaton
Epeirogeny in the Southern Rocky Mountains region: Evidence and origin
Geosphere, October 1, 2008; 4(5): 764 - 784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by University of Wyoming